> You replied with "Not any."
> That is where the requirement comes from, your own words.
I wasn't stating a requirement. I was disputing your report of the premise.
> or are we talking about code where there are minor changes that don't break it but using extra precision breaks it?
Yup.
> Yup
Then I will ask again, have you ever seen code that falls into this category? I haven't. And an RNG would not fall into this category.
> You replied with "Not any."
> That is where the requirement comes from, your own words.
I wasn't stating a requirement. I was disputing your report of the premise.
> or are we talking about code where there are minor changes that don't break it but using extra precision breaks it?
Yup.