Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Okay but how does this help the reader? If the worse code happens to optimize to the same thing it's still awful and you get no benefits. It's likely not to optimize down unless you have fast-math enabled because the extra float ops have to be preserved to be IEEE754 compliant



Fragment and vertex shaders generally don't target strict IEEE754 compliance by default. Transforming a * (b ? 1.0 : 0.0) into b ? a : 0.0 is absolutely something you can expect a shader compiler to do - that only requires assuming a is not NaN.


..how is it awful if it has the same result?


Because it perpetuates a misconception and is harder to read.


Just look at it.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: