Not allowed by whom ? On what criteria will you recognize bad actors ?
It's not that I don't agree with the sentiment but moderation is a complex problem that has side effects (censorhip). It's like you are saying "There shouldn't be any homeless
people", I agree but what is the exact solution ?
So I guess my question to you is what do you think is not working in the current system ?
I am arguing that it's working fine:
The half crazy person's comments are so faint I can't even read them, or [dead]
Not allowed by us, we, the community that doesn't trade in bad faith argument.
You have a point that the downvotes and flags do their work. That's pretty much banning. After they call a few more people homophobic slurs or insult their families, they'll probably be shadowbanned.
>On what criteria will you recognize bad actors?
Constant dodging of questions, shifting goalposts with aggressive language, personal insults, and so on. Signalled by being repeatedly downvoted or flagged for such behavior.
We're probably on a similar page, but I am slightly less concerned with censorship. Three week old accounts that have done little but troll have less "plot armor" than established accounts.
So I guess my question to you is what do you think is not working in the current system ? I am arguing that it's working fine: The half crazy person's comments are so faint I can't even read them, or [dead]