> > They proclaim the intention to report on all the relevant news with as little subjective bias as reasonably possible. > > I don't think that's ever been the case. > > > Opinion and editorial pages are not relevant news with little subjective bias. > > Even if it were somehow possible to produce a piece of reporting totally devoid of subjectivity, it wouldn't be interesting and no one would care, because most people aren't subject matter experts in the area of whatever the piece is about. > > That's the value provided by expert editorialists, which Krugman was: they frame events in a meaningful way, be it historical, personal, based on experience in whatever field, or with other meaningful comparisons. Yes, such framing is necessarily subjective, but it adds value. Subjectivity doesn't imply corruption.

A bit from left field. So, framing your idea with AI. What can we expect when we look at biases in our selves?