Oh, that wasn't very clear from the article.

jacobolus · on July 19, 2012

"It also has tweeted repeatedly that the account is in fact a legitimate Shell account. But of course, it, too is a fake. Not that web users realise."

pyre · on July 19, 2012

It's easy to overlook. The text of the tweet and the immediately following article text run together:

http://imgur.com/OHq5z

swores · on July 19, 2012

One of the downsides of disabling javascript is that you may not see websites as they intend you to see them.

pyre · on July 19, 2012

I'm only using Ghostery, I wouldn't expect that to affect the main content of a site.

Ghostery's blocked list:

  DoubleClick
  Facebook Connect
  Google +1
  Google Adsense
  Google Analytics
  LinkedIn Widgets
  NetRatings SiteCensus
  ScoreCard Research Beacon
  Twitter Button
  Tynt Insight

... just disabled Ghostery, and one of those is affecting the article content.

swores · on July 19, 2012

My guess is that Ghostery considers the javascript that is served by Twitter to be a tracking device (quite possibly correctly)... but I could be wrong.

pyre · on July 19, 2012

The article did a horrible job of in-lining those tweets.