Their speeds should be very similar, but which is faster is uncertain.

There have not been any published benchmarks demonstrating the speed of Cortex-X925 in a laptop/mini-PC environment.

In smartphones, Cortex-X925 and Snapdragon Elite have very similar speeds in single thread.

For multithreaded applications, 10 big + 10 medium Arm cores should be somewhat faster than 12 Snapdragon Elite.

The fact that NVIDIA Digits has a wider memory interface should give it even more advantages in some applications.

The Blackwell GPU should have much better software support in graphics applications, not only in ML/AI, in comparison with the Qualcomm GPU.

So NVIDIA Digits should be faster than a Qualcomm laptop, but unless one is interested in ML/AI applications the speed difference should not be worth the more than double price of NVIDIA.

If the Nvidia system runs reasonably well with stock distribution kernels, it may well be worth the extra price. Usually, an optimized, custom kernel is a warning sign, but maybe they have upstreaming plans, and support for other distributions is planned.

Sure, but less than half the memory bandwidth and inference is largely bandwidth bound.

The context was people that don't care about AI or Nvidia GPUs and just want an AArch64 system. So inference performance is irrelevant here

> lots of people will buy these machines to get an AArch64 Linux workstation—even if they are not interested in AI or Nvidia GPUs.

Ah, sure the Oryon cores are decent, GPU is a bit weak, even compared to the normal cheap/low end APUs.