Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Lightning is already better than USB C, and yet a new law has been passed banning it.



For definitions of "better" that don't consider its being proprietary, perhaps.


Yes, indeed, some things about it are better and some worse. Which means it’s good for consumers to have a choice, and more importantly, for companies with a track record of good taste in designing high-quality smartphones to have a free hand.

I trust Apple to make decisions that lead to a phone I enjoy using a lot more than I trust the EU regulatory bureaucracy to do so.


Consumers don't have a choice, though. Up until recently, if you wanted an iPhone, you get Lightning, and that's it. That's great for you, since you believe it's the best cable/connector for you. But if someone wanted something different, they had no choice, unless they wanted a different kind of smartphone. And I don't think someone is going to make an iPhone -> Android switch simply because of the cable. That's a bit absurd.


Lightning is worse to the point where it isn't even funny

  - 480Mb/s vs 120Gb/s data transfer
  - 9V? vs 48V
  - 2.4A? vs 5A
  - resulting in 18W vs 240W
  - proprietary vs open.
Youre calling the connector supporting 13.3x the power and 250x data transfer while being an open standard and almost the same size "worse".


What makes it better? Last I checked, the specs were objectively worse.


It's entirely legal to add a Lightning port to a device. Why do you think that was "banned"?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: