Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Demonstrably, humans do think, and arguably demonstrably, early life would go down a path of simple predictions (in the form of stimulus -> response). And demonstrably, evolution did lead to human level intelligence.

So I don’t think there needs to be a semantic debate over where in the process intelligence started. The early responses to stimulus is a form of prediction, but not one that requires thinking.

There can be much disagreement that prediction is at the core of intelligence, or if optimizing ability to predict leads to intelligence. But from the established facts, it is the case the higher forms of life were bootstrapped from the lower ones, and also our biochemistry does have reward functions. Successfully triggering those rewards will generally hinge on making successful predictions. Take from that what you will.




Prediction is a huge part of what intelligence does. I was questioning “prediction maximalism.”

Intelligence is also very good at pattern recognition. Did people once argue for pattern recognition maximalism?

Biological (including human) intelligence is clearly multi-modal and I strongly believe there are aspects that are barely understood if at all.

The history of CS and AI is a history of us learning how to make machines that are unbelievably good at some useful but strictly bounded subset of what intelligence can do: logic, math, pattern recognition, and now prediction.

I think we may still be far from general intelligence and I’m not even sure we can define the problem.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: