Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Apple Music is quite good. Better masters, good recommendations, no fuss - and they pay artists more, supposedly.


A big drawback is that they erase your data whenever you stop subscribing (playlists, liked songs, etc).


Oh that's fascinating. That's a privacy trade, isn't it?


Recently made the switch and have been very happy with the service.


Desktop app that doesn't work any more suddenly and there's no actual support to speak of. That's already five steps below Spotify.

Plus actually shitty UX/UI people like to call good, but it lacks plenty of really really basic features. Like having control over if a song is added to the queue to be played next or last, or just being able to preview what stations are going to play (it's a minefield of an UI to try and find new songs while also not interrupt the current one).


I'm not sure I can reproduce some of these complaints. Play next and add to queue are both there for me. What do you mean by "doesn't work any more"? I just opened it; it's definitely in need of a UX update but seems to work fine.


Maybe it's just the tvOS version that lacks the option I described? I was disappointed in Spotify on tvOS so I'm using Music there. I guess platform inconsistency is an another negative of Music.

And by "doesn't work" it just says "an error occured" and nothing helps. I've even reinstalled it. Judging by reddit posts about it, it's a common issue. (Its logs also provide 0 hints about the error it encounters.)


> they pay artists more, supposedly

They don't. Spotify pays out roughly 66% of their revenue as royalties, while Apple Music only does about 50%. [1]

[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-music-reveals-how-much-it... https://archive.is/lRZns


That percentage doesn’t really explain anything. What if Apple has more revenue? What if Apple users stream less, so royalty costs per subscription are lower? In both cases the AM payout could be fairer for artists and the percentage could still be lower.

The article you cite actually claims the latter is true, so it seems looking at just that statistic is misleading.


Dang that sucks.

Man, I really, really hate this situation.


No, they misread.


Did you even read what you posted ? "Its average per-stream payout rate is lower"


That comes down to Spotify being mostly ad supported users and Apple being all paid. If Spotify got rid of their free tier their 60-70% rev share would be more than Apple's 50%. But then the number of streams would go down by 50-60%, counterintuitively the total payout would only go down like 10-15% tho.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: