Half the article is about Note A and Note G.

Sure, but it is spoken about in the abstract. I enjoyed the article, but why not at least include "some" of the actual notes she wrote or at least a screenshot?

There was a link to directly to note G in the article, in fact, it's the exact same URL that you linked to.

Yes, and I said that explicitly in my post.

The difference is in my post it is one of the featured things. In the article that claims to show what the program actually did it is buried in the text.