"Xenon Deficiency Syndrome", mentioned in one of the examples on talking about medical conditions.
I knew it just had to be a made up thing for demonstration purposes but still I had to google that, haha... on the off chance there is some weird biological use for trace amounts of xenon.
Depending on the prominence of the user, that could have been further coerced as a fact or reference, and/or inferred as factual if enough people agreed, in the next training session.
Upvotes as truth-confidence scores, what could go wrong?
Ironically some iotas of truth can be outputted directly, but if the most explicitly articulated reference is by a (non power-) user on a forum in a comment, it will be sourced as anonymous/eponymous wisdom (unless suffiently coerced)
I knew it just had to be a made up thing for demonstration purposes but still I had to google that, haha... on the off chance there is some weird biological use for trace amounts of xenon.