Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well sadly, this thread has misinformed you.

Here's Top Gear explaining it, as my attempt to convey the same information seems to have bounced off most people replying:

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/electric/mythbusting-world-...

> But what if your existing petrol or diesel car is perfectly satisfactory? Obviously if you cause one less vehicle – of any kind – to be manufactured, you’re saving CO2 in the short term. But if you drive a lot of miles or your car is thirsty, then sell it to someone who drives less. Getting an EV would after a very few years move you into credit. If it’s efficient and you drive little, probably hold on to it for a while.

> In most areas of life, the greenest thing is simply to buy less stuff and keep it for longer. But with ICE cars, because they emit so much CO2 in use, it’s not always so simple.



> Here's Top Gear explaining it [...]

(Apologies for the snark but...) mythbusting articles without any experimental data or references to back up claims - or claims they say they've debunked - aren't really my thing. Hopefully not really a HN thing either :/


Sadly, a single paragraph is not a good defense.

I agree that there are shades of gray though. My counterpoint is that I am not so sure the non-commercial vehicle market is that efficient that when you sell a vehicle that it is going to the best candidate best on the miles driven. Your vehicle is still in the fleet and being used. I think the simpler argument is that for any modern vehicle, there is not a significant enough gain and you are better holding on to the vehicle until it reaches your preferred EOL.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: