Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Well, this is the defining trend of our technological progress. People getting what they want makes them unhappy in the long, multigenerational term.

We innovate because we like being comfortable. We don’t want to tend to a fire constantly to be warm. We don’t want to depend on the randomness of hunting/foraging to have a full belly. We don’t want to take days and days of travel to go a few towns over. We don’t want to have to deal with people we don’t know because that’s anxiety inducing.

So we invent all those things that means many modern humans can just stay comfy, warm and fed at home with all their basic needs met without having to go through all this discomfort.

The problem now is that we’re all unhealthy, lonely, feel purposeless (and to top it all the planet is on fire).






> The problem now is that we’re all unhealthy, lonely, feel purposeless (and to top it all the planet is on fire).

None of that is true. You're projecting what some people struggle with onto everyone, when the data indicates people are better off today. And mental health issues aren't unique to the industrialized world. Also, the planet is warming, but it's not on fire. Total exaggeration.


> when the data indicates people are better off today

And what "data" would that be?

https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/05/03/new-surgeon-genera...

https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/usable-knowledge/24/10/wha...

https://www.bib.bund.de/EN/News/2024/2024-05-29-FReDA-Policy...

And what "purpose" are people looking forward to?

> Also, the planet is warming, but it's not on fire. Total exaggeration.

What does that even mean? It's not literally burning, so it's fine? Because you say so?


But some billionaire did a TED talk where he said that the global poverty rate has been constantly declining, which is true, even if it is not meaningful if you remove it from the real-world context of purchasing power, social safety nets, support networks and shared commons, and only a positive if you think sweatshops are good because they create job opportunities.

> And what "purpose" are people looking forward to?

What, you don't find increasing shareholder value compelling?

> It's not literally burning, so it's fine?

Presumably they think the climage catastrophe is not a big deal. "On fire" is clearly hyperbole but the point is that we're on a fast track to total global economic collapse (to say nothing about the death and destruction itself) as long as the answer is to carefully do some ineffective reductions and give more money to the industry to spend on "carbon capture" technology that creates more emissions in the process of being built, maintained and operated than it could ever hope to capture, but I digress.


There is plenty of data saying the average person is more unhealthy, lonely and unhappy than 50 years ago, at least in the developed world.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: