Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Define "software patents".

That "very plain language" only excludes business method patents i.e. "...on a computer" or "...on the internet" patents. These are not computer algorithm patents (for example, a new sorting or encryption algorithm). The term "software patent" does not denote a distinct class of patent.

Computer algorithms are patentable in the EU. I can think of many, many examples of computer algorithms that are patented in the EU (e.g. crypto patents, compression algorithms, codecs, etc.).



Patents have certainly been granted, but the language I link to above is very clear about the validity of such patents:

"The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions [...]: schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers."

[my emphasis]


Thanks for the clarification. 'Business method' patents would I take it be the ones like Blackboard's patents for course management.

My original point stands: I can't see the logic in any district court having jurisdiction over patent cases.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: