Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

While one is undoubtedly worse than the other, I don’t think it’s a good idea to say it’s not abuse because it’s not as bad as the worst possible variety.

I happen to agree this probably doesn’t rise to the level of child abuse, but there’s a large range between there and unfed/physically/sexually harmed.

We shouldn’t cheapen it, but we shouldn’t make it too expensive either.




You’re right. But this is decidedly not abuse; it’s a parenting style that many are unaccustomed to, and perhaps doesn’t work as well in the US, I have no idea.

But it’s not abuse.

You’re correct that physical/sexual harm and malnutrition are not the only things that constitute abuse either, though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: