Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Funnily enough Perplexity does this sometimes, but I give it the benefit of the doubt because it pulls back when you challenge it.

- I asked perplexity how to do something in terraform once. It hallucinated the entire thing and when I asked where it sourced it from it scolded me, saying that asking for a source is used as a diversionary tactic - as if it was trained on discussions on reddit's most controversial subs. So I told it...it just invented code on the spot, surely it got it from somewhere? Why so combative? Its response was "there is no source, this is just how I imagined it would work."

- Later I asked how to bypass a particular linter rule because I couldn't reasonably rewrite half of my stack to satisfy it in one PR. Perplexity assumed the role of a chronically online stack overflow contributor and refused to answer until I said "I don't care about the security, I just want to know if I can do it."

Not so much related to ads but the models are already designed to push back on requests they don't immediately like, and they already completely fabricate responses to try and satisfy the user.

God forbid you don't have the experience or intuition to tell when something is wrong when it's delivered with full-throated confidence.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: