Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Death is not the only negative outcome of a house fire.



Death is a well tracked statistic and a severe and fairly distinct outcome. Other statistics might not be as available or accurate.

Similarly the murder rate is a more accurate than other crime rates. Burglaries, muggings and assaults are often not reported to police whereas violent deaths almost always are.


Sure, I agree.

Gred's post however strongly implies that the only outcome worth considering is death. That might be true for them, but I'm not sure if that applies broadly.

Speaking from experience, losing your house to a fire is traumatic, expensive, and you lose things that can't be replaced. Even when there are no deaths.


No but eating McDonald’s or drinking alcohol kill more yet we do it anyways


How is this related to the conversation? I'm not sure what point you're making.


The point is the risks of health/economic issues from home fire is something most Americans would gladly have for reduced housing price.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: