Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> The reputations and careers (and liability) of serious journalists rest on uncovering important stories

Maybe it used to be so, but not anymore. Now the careers of journalists (I don't know how to define "serious" without going into true-scotsman weeds) depend much more on ideological conformity and willingness to serve partisan interests and push the narrative that needs to be pushed. The ones that are not willing to do that - regardless of political affiliations - find themselves outside of the "mainstream" media, usually on Substack or likewise stand-alone platforms.




What is that based on? I read most of the serious publications, and I don't see it. Could you give examples of these people? Of events?

> I don't know how to define "serious" without going into true-scotsman weeds

Yes, agreed. I'm just leaving it ambiguous.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: