> I am very okay with not seeing CSAM, but your argument doesn’t hold water.

By this you mean that its very easy to define a clear set of rules for moderation?

In the case of CSAM, yes. In the case of other material? No. Again, I side heavily on the side of freedom of speech, but the argument that limiting speech and limiting some specific kinds of widely condemned speech are orthogonal does not stand up to the most basic scrutiny.

I don't think it's possible to have a clear set of rules that cannot be interpreted maliciously.