Last section is about foreign relations.

First section has info on tackling the climate crisis.

With climate change, for example, it says "she will unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis as she builds on this historic work, advances environmental justice, protects public lands and public health, increases resilience to climate disasters, lowers household energy costs, creates millions of new jobs, and continues to hold polluters accountable to secure clean air and water for all."

But doesn't explain any of it. This is not detailed. Just listing things you want is not detailed.

If I was running for president and said I want nobody to die from cancer, I want everybody to get a quality education and want to stop the fentanyl crisis nobody would say that was descriptive. How am I going to do any of those?

Hiliarously, it is trying to use Harris' vote on the Inflation Reduction Act to show she will lower energy costs and yet mine are more expensive now.

In a two-party race like this, I'd argue she kinda doesn't have to. People know Donald Trump as "the oil president", simply marketing yourself as the alternative is all she has to do when her opponent's reputation precedes himself.

Normally I'd agree, and overall I resent how American policy promotion on both sides of the aisle has turned into virtue signalling. This is a good example of taking advantage in an adversaries blind-spot though - climate change is a real concern, and certain candidates can't even acknowledge that with a straight face.