Some of the oldest init systems made decisions that were sensible at the time but not so much now, e.g. when storage is hundreds of thousands of dollars per GB you don't want to log everything, when it's tens of cents per GB you do. But you can obviously make a non-monolithic init system that causes output to be stored to a log instead of being discarded.

So then systemd comes in, solves some of the old problems and independently, unnecessarily introduces new ones by being a huge monorepo that lacks clean and stable interfaces between its own components, inhibiting anyone else from providing a viable competing implementation of an individual component.

Then people complain about the latter and the defense that comes back is of the former. But that's no defense -- we could instead be making the good change and not the bad change.

That's exactly what Microsoft did back in the era with Word and others, just like GP stipulated.