Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Modern Vintage Gamer recently went over Wing Commander and talked about this in detail. The problem with DosBox is the framerate chugs with lots of enemies on screen and then speeds up as you take them out one by one. He suggests the best way to play is on a PC that it was originally designed for.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuFNFd8I0WU&t=680s

BTW, I remember playing Wing Commander way back in the day. No game sucked me in like that before or since.



You are absolutely correct that DosBox still doesn't get Wing Commander 100% perfect - it however does at least get a playable experience with the CPU cycle controls, and a much better experience than running it in dos in say VirtualBox.

I run and maintain some old 386/486 boxes as a hobby - I honestly don't think its worth it for almost anyone, DosBox will be just fine for 99% of people.


This is a great info. Thank you! I'll have to find some time to fire it up one of these days knowing that the experience is as good as you say.


Does fixed cycles fail to address that?


Not sure, but he does mention the best way to do it is to run DosBox "at around 3000 cycles". So I take it that means fixed cycles?


>He suggests the best way to play is on a PC that it was originally designed for.

Even Captain Obvious himself is going to sigh something fierce.


I don't think that's fair. There is a ton of software where the experience on the PCs it was designed for is mediocre, but other hardware/software is compatible and much better.


Captain Obvious must have always played games that didn't have a frame limiter, because very often games will run better on higher spec hardware than they were originally designed for. Obviously.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: