Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I was describing the current state. Children cannot currently buy vapes; adults can. However, it still ends up in the hands of children.



I don't see why that's relevant to the ban


It's relevant to the article

> intended to protect children's health

It sounds like you disagree and are expressing that disagreement as a difference of understanding. Is that right?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: