(The submission should have a [2006] in the title)
As silly as it sounds to say, the importance of Boatmurdered can't be understated. Boatmurdered was an internet sensation and put Dwarf Fortress on the map; the depth and complexity of the simulation was mind-blowing to read about for the era (and it's still more-or-less unmatched in many ways). Without that there'd be no Infiniminer (and later, no Rimworld, no Factorio), and without that there'd be no Minecraft.
TL;DR: Is it possible that it seems to you that Dwarf Fortress was the first game with procedural generation?
Full comment:
Factorio wouldn't exist with Dwarf Fortress?
If this is a claim that Dwarf Fortress paved the way for deep(er) simulation games, enabling Factorio, I don't think that's accurate.
I was ~18 in 2006 and a huge fan of simulation games when I was growing up. There were plenty with depth that approximated Factorio.
I've never heard of Infiniminer or Rimworld.
5 minute review of Infiniminer shows its a very different game and has a specific triad of inspirations named by the creator, all of which predate Dwarf Fortress. (Team Fortress, Infinifrag, and Motherload)
Rimworld is nearly a decade after Dwarf Fortress, so its impossible for me to claim it wouldn't exist without it, and I believe vice versa.
Notch (the original creator of Minecraft) mentioned he got inspired by DF:
> Infiniminer is the main inspiration for the blocky design and the terrain deforming. Dwarf Fortress is the main inspiration for the survival game mode, and this is where I want to take the majority of the gameplay.
> I had this great idea to apply for a job at Mojang as working on Minecraft might be very inspiring. I didn't get any reply, and later on, I decided to try to make something on my own.
According to Factorio's developers, they were heavily inspired by Minecraft factory mods like IndustrialCraft. Minecraft is commonly said to have been inspired by Infiniminer.
I'm not aware of Infinimer being inspired by Dwarf Fortress.
RimWorld is basically "Dwarf Fortress on an alien planet", although the simulation doesn't go as ridiculously deep. RimWorld has in turn inspired a bunch of attempts to do "RimWorld on a spaceship," but none of so far have achieved the status of being a "classic".
No, their claim is that specific lineage of inspirations led to the games we enjoy today. It is very unlikely that the games would exist in the same form without the innovations and discoveries made along the way.
SimCity, Age of Empires, Sim$X (they really need to rerelease SimAnt), Roller Coaster Tycoon were my gotos, off the top of my head. Railroad Tycoon is probably the best obvious simile but also wasn't my favorite. Too much management :)
Crafting games are games where a lot of the gameplay is combining items in particular ways to get new items.
Factory games are crafting games where you build raw logic, wires, conveyor belts etc. for automating crafting. Some are pure factory games where automation is the only way to craft anything, others reveal their debt to modded Minecraft by having a player person who does the first crafting by hand.
There were arguably factory games evolving alongside Minecraft, in particular Zach Barth's programming/automation puzzle games. But you'd be hard pressed to find a factory game before modded Minecraft.
The first game anyone built a working computer in was Dwarf Fortress, although through unintended game mechanisms. I believe this was what inspired Notch to add redstone to Minecraft, the first intended game mechanism for Factory-style gameplay.
I had a blast with Rimworld. Still play it occasionally for the "Dwarf Fortress but sci-fi" urge it fulfills. But in the long run when trying to do a huge generational colony I can't stand how "gamey" it feels. Maybe there's some mod or something to fix it, I'm not sure. But the raids/diseases/bad events feel like they're more targeted for lack of a better way to put it, like the game is intentionally tailoring them to your situation vs just simulating a world where those things tend to happen. DF's "events" feel more natural over the long run.
I love the setting of Rimworld but cannot get past how dumb the pawns are. As in, it requires so much human micromanagement to make sure they occasionally clean, haul, and tend to the guy who is 1h away from dying rather than the one who has an scratch
I have the opposite problem. I want to play Rimworld, and it IS fun, but I always want more. Rimworld feels too basic and I find myself craving the complexity of DF instead. Ultimately I decide not to dive back into DF and I end up enjoying neither. Oxygen Not Include is great though.
Rimworld makes war crimes a little too easy. And as the other person said, the AI is bad. Though personally I think it’s bad in all three. Self preservation and the lack of it requires a lot of reloading from save points.
Nitpick, but I think you mean “can’t be overstated” - no matter how important you state the thing to be, it’s not overstated, because the thing is just that important. Hence, can’t be overstated.
If you’re talking about something wouldn’t that always mean that you in fact ‘could’ care less?
Saying that you ‘couldn’t care less about X’ doesn’t seem logical at all because you of course could, ‘could care less’ is of course not particularly informative unless you’re expressing intention or a desire to care less about something.
My favorite Dwarf Fortress playthrough description and did a good job of explaining how the game actually works and how different people approach the game. I believe someone made a comic or animation or something based on this specific playthrough.
Reminds me a lot of sofrware engineering projects where someone works on this pet project for a long time then someone else comes in and completely ignores it or has no idea how to use it because there's no documentation...
> Reminds me a lot of sofrware engineering projects where someone works on this pet project for a long time then someone else comes in and completely ignores it or has no idea how to use it because there's no documentation...
I didn't understand how this connects to the first paragraph at first, but I think you're saying this playthrough is an analog to someone making such documentation, thus saving DF from such a fate?
The general point is certainly true, there's a lot of projects out there that never see as much use as they could, where someone has put a lot of effort into the work, but never managed to present it in an accessible way - where you can't even tell what problem it's solving, even if you're dealing with that problem at that very moment.
No documentation is one obvious way this happens, but there's also lots of projects where there's a good amount of documentation but only at the wrong abstraction level. It's easy to get lost in the implementation and document only the minutiae, but taking the small step to imagine your past self, go back to the big picture, and write just a few paragraphs from that perspective, can make a project so much more usable for others. (It's also ok to just create something for yourself and put it out there in a "take it or leave it" way if you're not charging for it, this is more about the projects that do want more people to use them, but just never manage to present themselves in the right way.)
> I didn't understand how this connects to the first paragraph at first, but I think you're saying this playthrough is an analog to someone making such documentation, thus saving DF from such a fate?
(Not OP) Possibly, but one of the repeated themes in Boatmurdered is a number of fortress defenses (some with considerable collateral damage) attached to a variety of scattered and unmarked levers.
Does pulling this lever lower the drawbridge, irrigate the fields, or douse the world in cleansing magma? Only one way to tell!
A Boatmurdered read is one of the few times I actually burst out laughing in front of my screen - multiple times.
Every time I read it I want to get back into dwarf fortress, but this damn game introduces so much new stuff over time that I can't shake off the feeling it's just too much for me. I _loved_ that game until about ten years back but haven't played in ages.
Every time I look back at Boatmurdered it shocks me just how short of a time Dwarf Fortress spent as a 2D game. 2D had releases between August 2006 and January 2007, then there was a nine month gap, then the first 3D version.
And I think we're still waiting on any reintroduction of cave supports and structural integrity beyond "no floating blocks".
And if you grew up with the 2D version you probably resent it to this day.
When I bought Minecraft, I didn't like a lot of the changes they were making and thought the game was already good the way it was. Why does there need to be an alternate reality, this new ore that's only useful for making things blue, and people spamming chat asking everyone to sleep at the same time?
Years later, I found out I'd bought it only a matter of weeks after they added this new ore that's only useful for making logic circuits, weeks after they redesigned the logic circuits, weeks after they added mob spawners to the game, weeks after they added minecarts to the game. In fact I think the minecart test video was still the most prominent thing on the Minecraft homepage.
I still think hunger was the beginning of the decline though. I signed up for a resource gathering and building game, not a nighttime survival game. Or possibly the beta 1.6 minecart booster fix where they took away a way to build creative mechanisms for the sole reason of "that's a bug and we fix bugs".
(Fun fact: the fix is one extra line of code that, last I checked, still brings back the creative mechanism building possibilities if you remove it)
Why would want to hear a so wonderfully written story changed into a shallow, awkwardly phrased shadow of itself, read by robot voices in podcaster cadence?
I asked ChatGPT to rephrase your emotive reply into an expression of personal preference (which I think you were trying to express):
> I feel that transforming such a wonderfully written story into a podcast with robot voices might result in a shallow and awkward rendition that doesn’t capture the essence of the original work.
I can definitely agree with that in the general sense! But I have a long commute, and I thought the content of it would still come through well enough, and I've appreciated it for a few other subjects. It's not as good as having professional voice actors read it out, but it still has some value to folks!
> I asked ChatGPT to rephrase your emotive reply into an expression of personal preference (which I think you were trying to express):
I find that hilarious and sad. When you find an expression of another human hard to understand, it makes more sense to ask that human for clarification instead of using statistics or heuristics.
Even more so if that technical process is known to produce "hallucinations".
In this case it almost completely dropped my emphasis on "podcaster cadence". So while I have no idea what goal you had in mind when creating that "remix" of my comment, I can tell you that it changed its meaning and for the worse.
The same will happen if you process literary work like Boatmurdered.
If you've not been back in a while, give it a look a lot has been added. There's multi-tile enemies now, and a UI!
If you do go back, there's an option in the Game tab in the settings to bring back keyboard controls for area selection called "Keyboard cursor enabled".
As silly as it sounds to say, the importance of Boatmurdered can't be understated. Boatmurdered was an internet sensation and put Dwarf Fortress on the map; the depth and complexity of the simulation was mind-blowing to read about for the era (and it's still more-or-less unmatched in many ways). Without that there'd be no Infiniminer (and later, no Rimworld, no Factorio), and without that there'd be no Minecraft.