Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

They really are hard to work with compared to languages where you declare which exceptions you'll throw,. I always get angry when pylint raises an error for catching over-broad exceptions[0]

Of course I'm catching broad exceptions because I have no idea what kind of exception is going to be thrown 12 dependencies deep and I don't want it to completely crash the program instead of letting me retry or do something else.

0:https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user_guide/messages/...




Yup this drives me crazy. I've been bitten by urllib3 or SSL exceptions being bubbled up by random libraries so many times that now I always include an except Exception: block just in case.


100% agree. Most of my bare except: are followed by import pdb;pdb.set_trace() so I can figure out what went wrong and then fix my code so that it never happens again, but I still leave it there because I I don't have time to consider the millions of ways my hastily thrown-together python script is going to fail nor do I want to game out how many different errors could happen. If Python would have been this hard to use 20 years ago, I wouldn't have been able to learn to program.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: