>There are no such things as absolute static things in relativity theory.
Well there is light-speed, which is an "absolute universal constant" - though of course light-speed is directly related to time. Also general relativity as a bit more to say on the topic.
>Approximate static time and space are convenient illusions/approximations, that happen to be very useful for us as a species when it comes to surviving and replicating, but the Universe has no obligation to cater to our feeble minds or senses when it comes to reality.
Sure. Even theories that don’t rely on time to be a fundamental dimension fall in the same category of "universe doesn’t need our small minds to be able to grab its actual complexity".
Well there is light-speed, which is an "absolute universal constant" - though of course light-speed is directly related to time. Also general relativity as a bit more to say on the topic.
>Approximate static time and space are convenient illusions/approximations, that happen to be very useful for us as a species when it comes to surviving and replicating, but the Universe has no obligation to cater to our feeble minds or senses when it comes to reality.
Sure. Even theories that don’t rely on time to be a fundamental dimension fall in the same category of "universe doesn’t need our small minds to be able to grab its actual complexity".