As I write many more things collaborating with people who do not speak English as a first language, it is more obvious than ever that grammar and spelling errors have absolutely no correlation with the quality of the argument when it comes to professional communication.
At some level sure, but if a lawyer is typing a 30 page document in a few hours, they might have someone proofread it once but I guarantee you the thought that went into writing it was far more serious than the thought that went into proofreading it.
Me too, I'm no longer the grammar nazi I used to be. It still comes across as sloppy though.
> likely a red herring to make the defense think the plaintiff is careless
That's interesting!