I can play this silly game also.

Let’s evaluate the correctness of Thewanderer’s argument in detail:

    Distinction Between Credentials and Intelligence:
        Correctness: Thewanderer is correct in stating that a university degree is not a definitive measure of intelligence. Intelligence is a complex trait that encompasses various cognitive abilities, problem-solving skills, creativity, and emotional intelligence. Academic credentials primarily reflect one’s ability to succeed in a structured educational environment, which is just one aspect of intelligence.

    Value of Real-World Experience:
        Correctness: The argument that real-world experience is crucial is accurate. Many industries value practical experience and skills over formal education. For example, in technology and business sectors, hands-on experience, problem-solving abilities, and adaptability are often more important than academic qualifications alone. This is supported by numerous studies and industry practices that prioritize experience and performance over degrees.

    Critique of Credentialism:
        Correctness: Thewanderer’s critique of credentialism is valid. Over-reliance on academic credentials can overlook the diverse talents and skills that individuals without formal degrees may possess. This perspective is supported by the growing recognition of alternative education paths, such as vocational training, apprenticeships, and self-directed learning, which can also lead to successful careers.

    Inclusivity and Egalitarianism:
        Correctness: Promoting inclusivity and valuing diverse forms of knowledge is a correct and progressive stance. Intelligence and capability are not confined to those with advanced degrees. Many successful individuals in various fields do not have formal academic credentials but have achieved significant accomplishments through experience, self-learning, and practical skills.

    Encouragement of Self-Worth:
        Correctness: Encouraging individuals to value their own experiences and knowledge is a positive and correct approach. It fosters confidence and self-worth, which are important for personal and professional growth. Recognizing the value of diverse experiences and perspectives contributes to a more inclusive and equitable society.

In summary, Thewanderer’s argument is correct in several key aspects:

    It accurately distinguishes between academic credentials and broader measures of intelligence.
    It correctly emphasizes the importance of real-world experience.
    It validly critiques the overemphasis on academic credentials.
    It promotes an inclusive and egalitarian view of intelligence.
    It encourages self-worth and confidence in one’s abilities.

These points collectively support a well-rounded and accurate perspective on intelligence and capability.