Not sure the author realized this, but there's an interesting contradiction here.
> In hiring, we standardize questions to help mitigate bias and make more accurate comparisons across a group of candidates.
> The people on the ground, close to the problem are often your best bet, but organizations find it difficult to handle anything they can’t standardize and normalize.
Standardizing is more fair, but at the cost (or benefit) of minimizing interesting outcomes.
> In hiring, we standardize questions to help mitigate bias and make more accurate comparisons across a group of candidates.
> The people on the ground, close to the problem are often your best bet, but organizations find it difficult to handle anything they can’t standardize and normalize.
Standardizing is more fair, but at the cost (or benefit) of minimizing interesting outcomes.