> So much hate here in these comments and threads.
This is a shallow dismissal of the legitimate criticisms that others have of this project.
This is Hacker News. The culture and goal is to satisfy intellectual curiosity and have interesting conversations. The point is NOT to emotionally dogpile (either positively or negatively) on things. That's boring, not enlightening, not intellectual gratifying, not curiosity-satisfying. If you have a legitimate praise or criticism, then you can air it, as long as it's interesting.
No, I think he has a point. There's more than one person saying stuff like "these are awful", which is unnecessarily harsh. Sycophancy isn't good, but neither is just ripping on someone's work. You can give constructive criticism and still be nice about it.
100%, and the author is self-aware enough to even offer an opportunity to "fix bugs," meaning if the community put their money where their mouth is, we can probably help the author upgrade these pretty easily. I'm jotting notes on the various "trees" I can contribute to myself, and plan on sending those later today. Hope others join me.
> The point is NOT to emotionally dogpile (either positively or negatively) on things.
which is what he GP is criticizinh. What interesting conversation do we get out of "These skill trees are so awful....Also they aren't trees." or "Almost as if this whole thing was the output of an LLM" do we get here?
This is a shallow dismissal of the legitimate criticisms that others have of this project.
This is Hacker News. The culture and goal is to satisfy intellectual curiosity and have interesting conversations. The point is NOT to emotionally dogpile (either positively or negatively) on things. That's boring, not enlightening, not intellectual gratifying, not curiosity-satisfying. If you have a legitimate praise or criticism, then you can air it, as long as it's interesting.