Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Perhaps if they added integrated batteries that only initiated a power draw to charge when they reached a specific level they wouldn't need to draw power from the grid constantly. Expensive way to solve the problem though, perhaps.



That would use more power because of losses in charging the batteries and standby loss in the battery themselves.

They could optimize for lower power. 0.3W seems pretty high, I would bet they could reduce that by a factor of 10 if they tried


Can you still send 802.11b/g/n with 0.03W power consumption?


These guys are doing it using just 0.00015W

http://supermechanical.tumblr.com/post/25189115532/its-all-o...

Of course it depends on how often you "call home" to check for any information. What might be acceptable for monitoring temperature would not work for a switch when you expect immediate response.


It might have been 0.03W. I’ll need to check again… It was either 0.3 or 0.03.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: