I prefer the traditional style maps because if you deviate from the expected route you still have a map of the area.
For example a GPS device will give sometimes give you a ridiculous number of turn by turn directions in a row. Go 100 feet merge right, go 200 feet merge left, go 50 feet and take a right, go 300 feet and make a left.
There's something very pleasing about dedicating so much technical attention to something that is so artful. I love seeing map styles like this- not sure where I'd use one myself, but I sure want to...
Tangentially related, I like this really simple experiment with map simplification from a few years ago: http://adamsmith.as/blurry_maps/
Obviously not nearly as involved as this, but a nice example of what a really simple transform can do aesthetically: It just median-filters Google Maps, which has the effect of removing text, simplifying boundaries, and producing large flat color areas.
I love that slippy maps are a commodity such that people can making art and craft them in new and wonderful ways.
There's already a nice collection of other twists on the slippy-map-as-art thing here. One more is Stamen's Pretty Maps, which does the heavy lifting in SVG and combines Flickr shapefiles in very interesting way: http://prettymaps.stamen.com/
Here's Stamen's watercolor map: http://maps.stamen.com/watercolor/#12/37.7706/-122.3782