>spreading deadly misinformation is a constitutionally protected right
For the people saying that it is a protected right, then how come you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater when there isn't a fire?
I'm not trying to argue one side or the other - because I don't have a good answer. But it's not as one sided as some people make it out to be - free speech isn't totally free.
>For the people saying that it is a protected right, then how come you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater when there isn't a fire?
That's a terrible example, not only because the ruling where it's used was overturned, but it was also used to justify imprisoning anti-draft activists.
For the people saying that it is a protected right, then how come you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater when there isn't a fire?
I'm not trying to argue one side or the other - because I don't have a good answer. But it's not as one sided as some people make it out to be - free speech isn't totally free.