Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> How do you prevent movement to an equilibrium where reviewers give favorable reviews to the reviewers of their own papers?

Peer-review of peer review. If all peer review is public, then people can analyse the trends.




It's peer reviewers all the way down then ;)




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: