Quite a few responses to your questions based on current state of AI.
Firstly, this is never going backwards. It will only get more capable. There will likely be algo changes that unlock new capabilities over time. There are definitely areas that humans have the advantage but this is similar to the “god of the gaps” concept in that the area where people have an advantage will reduce over time.
There’s currently no real understanding in the model and it’s really amazing what we can do with hyper-autocomplete. Humans made that happen. We’re the ones doing the innovation.
We’ve long been in the business of automating jobs away. This time it’s our own.
For the foreseeable future, get good at leveraging it and stay current.
(Intuition: AI is also good at the business layers. It can probably produce better specs than many (not all) people paid to do it. It can generate ideas and communicate them in many formats. It’s super confident, so could easily be a consultant. I don’t think the business analysts and strategy people should be too confident.)
Firstly, this is never going backwards. It will only get more capable. There will likely be algo changes that unlock new capabilities over time. There are definitely areas that humans have the advantage but this is similar to the “god of the gaps” concept in that the area where people have an advantage will reduce over time.
There’s currently no real understanding in the model and it’s really amazing what we can do with hyper-autocomplete. Humans made that happen. We’re the ones doing the innovation.
We’ve long been in the business of automating jobs away. This time it’s our own.
For the foreseeable future, get good at leveraging it and stay current.
(Intuition: AI is also good at the business layers. It can probably produce better specs than many (not all) people paid to do it. It can generate ideas and communicate them in many formats. It’s super confident, so could easily be a consultant. I don’t think the business analysts and strategy people should be too confident.)