This makes very little sense (as a contrast to chatgpt predicted that the likely continuation of factorial and 5 is 120).
Perhaps if you are able to share the chat session it's possible to see if you likely confused the issue with various factorial implementations - or got chatgpt to run your code with 5 as input?
Perhaps if you are able to share the chat session it's possible to see if you likely confused the issue with various factorial implementations - or got chatgpt to run your code with 5 as input?
I mean the code is redundant:
https://chatgpt.com/share/be249097-5067-4e3d-93c7-3eebedb510...