> all evidence suggests that there's no information coming into the simulation from the outside
sorry, which evidence suggests this? (it's not hard to imagine an external observer feeding back into the simulation)
(btw, I agree that the argument is flawed for the reasons you cite -- I don't agree that we have any evidence around whether or not there's information flow in/out of this simulation.)
sorry, which evidence suggests this? (it's not hard to imagine an external observer feeding back into the simulation)
(btw, I agree that the argument is flawed for the reasons you cite -- I don't agree that we have any evidence around whether or not there's information flow in/out of this simulation.)