This is something I find absolutely bizarre: for every person who is willing to make ridiculously exaggerated claims about something, there are thousands willing to believe them. One example which springs to mind is the "spam free wordpress" plugin[0], which claims to use "anonymous password authentication to block 100% of all comment spam with zero false positives."
As it turns out, "anonymous password authentication" means that it gives you a randomly generated string which you have to copy and paste into another box each time you submit a comment. It sounds like something a machine could do because it is something a machine could do with ease. And yet nobody seems to have noticed this for two reasons:
1) The author deletes all the comments on his blog questioning why the system works
2) It has a 4.5 star rating on the WordPress plugin DB
As a result, the author is still making ridiculously exaggerated claims about the capability of his system, like "If Gawker had been using the anonymous password authentication built into Spam Free WordPress this incident [the Gawker break-in in 2010] would not have happened." Another gem is "CAPTCHA is not used because it is hard to read, unnecessary, easily cracked, and reduces the number of real comments substantially."
So there it is, another snake-oil salesman spreading FUD and making users (of some very popular websites[1]) suffer.
If I had not witnessed that, I would never believe that it happened. The Raspberry Pi team fell for something that any kid who can write a python script should have known had the utility of a voodoo incantation? I'm floored.
On the bright side, web server performance, reliability, and maintenance are much more concrete than "amount of spam prevented", and general internet meritocracy has worked well towards ensuring G-WAN's lack of adoption.
As it turns out, "anonymous password authentication" means that it gives you a randomly generated string which you have to copy and paste into another box each time you submit a comment. It sounds like something a machine could do because it is something a machine could do with ease. And yet nobody seems to have noticed this for two reasons:
1) The author deletes all the comments on his blog questioning why the system works
2) It has a 4.5 star rating on the WordPress plugin DB
As a result, the author is still making ridiculously exaggerated claims about the capability of his system, like "If Gawker had been using the anonymous password authentication built into Spam Free WordPress this incident [the Gawker break-in in 2010] would not have happened." Another gem is "CAPTCHA is not used because it is hard to read, unnecessary, easily cracked, and reduces the number of real comments substantially."
So there it is, another snake-oil salesman spreading FUD and making users (of some very popular websites[1]) suffer.
[0]: http://www.toddlahman.com/spam-free-wordpress/ [1]: http://www.raspberrypi.org/