Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I have some RT1176's in my "to try" pile.

The big thing holding me back was that their crypto accelerators were all locked behind NDAs (a dealbreaker for F/OSS work) while the ST ones are documented in the freely downloadable datasheet you can just google up.

But I did find some third party wrapper libraries that seemed to be able to use the crypto registers so it might be possible to figure things out from that. I haven't tried yet.

The other issue I had with the RT is that they lacked internal flash so PCB complexity is slightly higher than with a STM32.




> I have some RT1176's in my "to try" pile.

Keep in mind the dual-core 11xx chips are a bit harder to boot than the rest of the line - but you probably need the power domain flexibility for most FPGA projects (1064 has way fewer practically-usable 1v8 banks.)

> crypto accelerators were all locked behind NDAs

I've been able to use every bit of hard IP and high-assurance boot from registers using no vendor code whatsoever.

Here's what you are looking for:

https://github.com/JayHeng/imxrt-level2-boot/blob/master/dev...

> The other issue I had with the RT is that they lacked internal flash

The IMXRT1064 has a 4MB Winbond QSPI chip in-package, by the way!

> PCB complexity is slightly higher than with a STM32.

The Xilinx FPGA that is sitting next to your MCU incurs multiple orders of magnitude more PCB-complexity than a little QSPI flash, haha.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: