The trouble is the creators of OWL wanted to have performance and reliability bounds. That is, they want to make systems that act like more like a conventional database server than an SMT solver.
I think they could have made a more expressive standard and something like that might have had more appeal to people but been less consistent in terms of performance.
I think they could have made a more expressive standard and something like that might have had more appeal to people but been less consistent in terms of performance.