Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So this is where the people come from who responded to my MS diagnosis with diet plans…I can tell you, despite their clearly good intentions, it was really annoying. Same kind of thing with faith healers. Come at me after you’ve got some reliable data from repeated double-blind controlled trials. Until then, I’m really not interested what kind of kale smoothies might help nerve pain and paralysis.

They also used really unhelpful citations, like “see: Finland”.

Feel free to continue this discussion here and within nutrition enthusiast groups, but please consider the perspectives of someone who’s struggling with a fresh, serious diagnosis before telling them all the hidden secrets of raw diets. Part of getting diagnosed is, at least for me, doing a shit ton of research to know better what my body is doing to me. Part of that research is sifting through all the scams and B.S. NaturalNews[TM] crap that, relevant or not, reads just like this thread. So when people tried to respond to the news of my illness with recipes it felt really patronizing and minimized my experience for the purposes of highlighting their hobby.

Just for an outside perspective. If any of this is backed with reliable data, I’m happy to read it.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: