Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> After fifty minutes (one microcentury as von Neumann used to say)

I like this. I also had to check: 100 years * 10^-6 = 52.56 minutes.




Some of my favorites:

nanoacre = about 4 square millimeters

microfortnight = about 1.2 seconds

beard-second = 5-10 nanometers (depending on who you ask), or the length an average beard grows in one second


Working in HFT, my favorite is 1 nanosecond ≈ 1 foot


grace hopper would carry around nanosecond-long wires, for demonstrations

https://youtu.be/ZR0ujwlvbkQ?si=aAj2OkbS8cj_MeGo&t=2707


My favorite from What if? (xkcd):

20 miles per gallon ≈ 0.1 mm²

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2F%2820+mile%2Fgallo...


I think the beauty of "microcentury" is that things that take 50 minutes indeed feel like a "microcentury"


The feeling of how long certain tasks can feel!


my mind immediately went to college classes, which were almost always exactly 1 microcentury

perfect


Saturating 100Mbps will move about 1TB/day.


And a light foot is a nanosecond. Think about it…


a light nanosecond is a foot :)


Beat me to it!



Also attoparsec [1] ≈ 3 cm.

[1]: https://youtube.com/@attoparsec


15 minutes = 1 centiday


I like going the other way, too. My personal favorite:

kilosecond: 11.57 days

and fun to say, but never useful:

gigasecond: 31.68 years


I think you're confusing your kiloseconds with megaseconds.

* 60 seconds per minute

* 60 minutes per hour: 3600 seconds per hour

* 1 kilosecond = 16 minutes and 40 seconds

* 24 hours per day: 86,400 +/- 1 seconds per day

* 1,000,000 / 86,400 ~= 11.57

I love giving metric-using friends a hard time whenever they criticize imperial units of measure. I always tell them that I will happily embrace metric when they give up their irrational attachment to an archaic system of time-telling.


I love GNU Units for stuff like this, it's just such a fun utility:

  You have: microcentury
  You want: minutes
   * 52.594877
   / 0.019013259


And on a similar note :

Pi seconds is a nanocentury!


It's a cute remark, but why is 50 minutes the right cutoff? For a technical talk it seems long. For an entertaining keynote it seems short. Movies are 90+ minutes.


At both the universities I’ve attended, lectures lasted 50 minutes. The odd few we had that were 100 had a short break in the middle supposedly inspired by research on how attention levels decay and recover over time. Conference talks seem to usually hover around the 60 minute mark.

I find movies have become too long — especially in recent years.


Have movies really become longer again?

I consider 3+ hours indulgent (we get ice cream and beer, once or twice, during what used to be the reel changes here), but two and half hours is about right.

Two hours would be my bare minimum for "feature length", and when I see one and half hour "films" I wonder "why was this not made-for-TV"?


Still haven't seen some of recent movies that got recommended to me & that probably would like a lot. Because i know i just cant stop mid-movie and finish another day like some people can. And i can't justify watching a 3h movie... what a commitment... while i have no issue watching just one episode(... after another... before the sunlight screams that i am an irresponsible moron for binge-watching 6h during the week...)


The Matrix (which was being shown in cinemas recently, remastered, for the 25th anniversary), is 2 hours and 16 minutes. It feels like the perfect length to me.


Ghost in the Shell (1995) is 85 minutes long, just perfect.


Same here, regarding movies- we preferentially watch films under two hours, ideally 90-100 minutes, because that both fits between our child's bedtime and ours, and it's a better economy of time for a story in that format, rather than an indulgent marathon.

I doubt I will ever watch Heat again, unless over a couple days, and unless my child wants to I won't watch the Lord of the Rings again (and especially not The Hobbit movies; that was largely a waste of time, though I will gladly read The Hobbit at least once more before I die).

Mad Max: Fury Road (Black & Chrome version) I watched for the third time recently, but over two days.

Engaging conversation, though? I recently had the luxury of time and privilege of talking for three hours straight with a well-read college student. Not being a high school teacher anymore I'm out of touch with young-adult perspectives, and I have so many follow-up questions now.


It seems like movies have been getting longer. Streaming platforms has influenced movie lengths I think in some ways.


Humans don't do well concentrating on something for more than about an hour. So fifty minutes seems like a reasonable rule of thumb.

You can improve this if you make it more varied, adding interactions, changing media, multiple speakers taking turns, that sort of thing, but having a rule of thumb helps.

And it fits calendars nicely, fifty minutes per talk, ten minutes break between, one talk per hour.


> fifty minutes per talk, ten minutes break between

Yes, I suspect that's the real reason.


But that break was typically how long it took to get to the next class. So it might have been a break from active brain activity (as evidenced by the brain dead decisions of navigating hallways/lockers), it's not a break per se. Maybe one was determined by the other, but I remember having to hustle to get from one end of campus to the other in those 10 minutes in a very un-break like use of energy


> I remember having to hustle to get from one end of campus to the other in those 10 minutes

Yeah, personally I read it less as 50 minutes being some biological limit of human attention and more as once you go over people start thinking about how much longer you're going to be, how long it'll take to get to their class, weighing missing the end of this talk vs the start of the next one vs skipping their bathroom break/sprinting. Plus the added the distraction of people who have reached their limit getting up and squeezing their way past to leave.


That's why Pomodoro Technique works great..


In lectures in college, I always looked at my watch 35 minutes in, and it was downhill from there.


π seconds is a nanocentury: 1 year = 3.155 × 10^7 seconds (Programming Pearls by Jon Bentley)


This allows you to calculate the Earth's orbital velocity per second, as the orbital diameter in millions, divided by 10.

So if you think the radius is 93m miles, you get 18.6 mile/sec, but if you are not American, you think the radius is 150m km, so 30 km/s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_orbit


Love that! One nanocentury - about 3.16 seconds




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: