Sure, but that is the consequence of no consequences. It would be silly to be a ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		tardy_one on June 24, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: US prosecutors recommend Justice Department crimin... Sure, but that is the consequence of no consequences. It would be silly to be a quality fund when not voting or selling on risk analysis can't possibly cost an index fund more than they save.

unkulunkulu on June 24, 2024 [–]

> not voting or selling on risk analysis

I would be grateful if you could elaborate on this. Is this a strategy for a fund to make money that I don’t understand?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact