You're referring to compartmentalized departments. No one person or internal unit can truly understand the inner workings of this machine. This is by design.
Bankruptcy? There's indirectly trillions of dollars on the line if Boeing goes bankrupt. This is why I'm telling you, nothing significant will happen. Don't be an contrarian, just think about it. "Too Big to Fail", it's a real thing bud.
Bankruptcy means the shareholders and potentially some lenders are wiped out; it doesn't mean the company ceases to exist.
In a Boeing bankruptcy, roughly $100b of its paper money market cap may be "wiped out" (but for the company to go bankrupt that paper money would have to be worthless anyways), but the factories would keep producing. No "trillions" are on the line, even in that extreme case.
The company and its assets don't just evaporate when some executives go to prison.
> want to be pro-war, pro-profit, pro-death & destruction
Wat. I said Boeing is comprehensible and able to be held accountable. I also think they should, and will, be criminally charged, and that those charges carry material risk of bankruptcy. You, on the other hand, cast Boeing as a mythical beast unable to be comprehended much less checked.
We’re not discussing war and peace. But between those arguments, I’m not sure how you pull off this pivot.
Bankruptcy? There's indirectly trillions of dollars on the line if Boeing goes bankrupt. This is why I'm telling you, nothing significant will happen. Don't be an contrarian, just think about it. "Too Big to Fail", it's a real thing bud.