No, I'm saying that if you can keep all of our laws in your head at once there are scenarios where you can't follow all of the laws.

I'm also saying that we have case law that contradicts itself and violates the rules of how the courts are supposed to work. Those examples, if included in training data, would confuse an LLM and likely lead to poor results.

> Those examples, if included in training data, would confuse an LLM and likely lead to poor results.

I don't think that LLMs are good enough that they can they confused by logical inconsistencies in the training data.

Reminds me of this recent article featured here: https://adamunikowsky.substack.com/p/in-ai-we-trust-part-ii