UKAD accepted that the amount was far below any effective levels. The article makes this crystal clear. It also makes crystal clear that this was contamination, as Lizzy took a hair test to show she couldn’t have taken it deliberately.
The reason why is actually in the article but I’m sick of just typing it out for you when you can stop being lazy and read the thing yourself.
So you’re not going to read the article and instead make yourself look foolish by making points that the article clearly rebuts, with receipts. Who am I to question how you waste your weekend?
Who am I to believe? UKAD, who fought like hell to deny her defence before accepting it based on her work, or random internet commenter who can’t even be arsed to read the article before commenting?
The reason why is actually in the article but I’m sick of just typing it out for you when you can stop being lazy and read the thing yourself.