Even if, for the sake of argument, the amount of gray matter was 100% nurture, that would show that men for some reason pursue particularly those activities which cause them to end up with 7x more GM on average.
That would still be a very relevant (and curious) finding that would support my argument, given the correlation between GM and Autism, do I see that right?
That would still be a very relevant (and curious) finding that would support my argument, given the correlation between GM and Autism, do I see that right?