> Depends on how you look at it. WASM itself doesn't have any browser specific features (and on purpose), it's a universal bytecode VM designed with strict sandboxing in mind.
I know, but other than being able to run it in the browser, does WASM have any other benefits over compiling into C, LLVM, etc?
Firefox has C/C++ libraries compiled into WASM which is then compiled into native code. The end result is that the library is sandboxed into its own memory region.
I know, but other than being able to run it in the browser, does WASM have any other benefits over compiling into C, LLVM, etc?