Interesting that the OpenAI astroturfing brigade is coming out of the woodwork.
You do know of course that they asked to clone her voice. And when she said no did it anyway, then asked again immediately before release, and then Sam tweeted that it was her?
And then when her lawyers ask "So who did supply the voice for this?" they immediately take it down, and immediately hand over a trove of "proof" to WaPo, most of which is so flimsy it'd fall over in a small breeze.
Her agent, who has requested anonymity...
Tells WaPo that his client, who also "needs to remain anonymous" due to "fears for her safety" tha she told him that OAI "didn't mention SJ".
Tells WaPo that she gave him a statement that they can print...
What are these fears for the actress' safety that require her, and her agent, to remain anonymous?
Why was OAI ready with a trove of legal-reviewed documents to hand to WaPo the moment this blew up?
