> I have not seen the math but in order to achieve any meaningful scale it needs to be huge
How can you make a statement like that? If you're not aware of the mathematical basis for the plant then you can't quantify "huge". You're either regurgitating something you read elsewhere without any real understanding, or you're simply making untrue statements.
If this is a ridiculous concept, what do you propose instead? Further oil exploration? More coal? This project is making a meaningful step towards reducing our dependence on fossil fuels. If you want to criticise, fine, but please at least take the time to properly understand the costs involved and the alternative options.
How can you make a statement like that? If you're not aware of the mathematical basis for the plant then you can't quantify "huge". You're either regurgitating something you read elsewhere without any real understanding, or you're simply making untrue statements.
If this is a ridiculous concept, what do you propose instead? Further oil exploration? More coal? This project is making a meaningful step towards reducing our dependence on fossil fuels. If you want to criticise, fine, but please at least take the time to properly understand the costs involved and the alternative options.